Rack 2's core gameplay is similar in nature to Rack 1. You will be presented with characters in science-themed bondage scenarios, and given a number of toys and gadgets to interact with them. Unlike Rack 1, Rack 2 will feature several different bondage poses and machines, and it will allow you to control a heavily-customizable scientist character, so you can pleasure your subjects personally in a fashion similar to Bedplay.
Rack 2: Furry Science
Rack 2 will feature the same types of sex toys and gadgets you encountered in Rack 1, including sciencey favorites like the portal devices, size modification tools, orgasm denial rings/paints, estim equipment, and fucking machines. It will also introduce several new toys catering to a number of new fetishes, along with the ability to own and use multiple instances of the same toy.
Rack's gameplay revolves around bondage, sex toys, and fetishy science equipment. All of the fetishes that were found in Rack 1 will be present in Rack 2, along with several other commonly-requested fetishes, like heavier BDSM (whips, canes, spanking), paw play, sounding, milking/feeding, and bulging.
Rack 2 is a bondage-themed adult video game featuring predominately furry / anthropomorphic characters.You play the role of a scientist at Rack Laboratories, where you conduct sexual experiments for research and profit!
You can engage in anal sex, oral sex, masturbation, lesbianism, grinding, rimming, furry sex, hermaphrodite sex, spanking, whipping, milking, paw play, and other sexual fetishes in Rack 2: Furry Science. You can also disable sexual fetishes that you do not want to see in the game. You have over 70 types of body-to-body interactions in Rack 2 with more to come.
Rack 2 is a bondage-themed adult video game featuring predominately furry / anthropomorphic characters.You play the role of a scientist at Rack Laboratories, where you conduct sexual experiments for research and profit!
7. If you want to put your custom character on a rack, you will need to go the game menu by pressing the ESC button and going to options. There you will see the custom character frequency bar, turn it up all the way to generate a 100% chance of seeing your custom character among the 6 subjects' spots.
But I am offering my dog sitting services for free to anyone with a nice fuzzy creature that needs love in the greater Seattle area because I need to console myself with petting all the furry things.
New Suns is a forthcoming speculative fiction anthology edited by the great Nisi Shawl. I was able to acquire and read an advance copy, thanks to Netgalley. This book contains short stories by writers of color. Some of the writers are already well known to me, while in other cases this was my first introduction to their work. The anthology reflects the fact that so much of the most dynamic and powerful speculative fiction at this point in time is being written by people of color. The writers in this anthology radically revise familiar traditions, both western and other. They do what speculative fiction, whether future-oriented (science fiction) or past-oriented (fantasy fiction) at its best generally does: suggest alternatives that speak to our possibility of survival in a world currently ravaged by neoliberal capitalism, with its racism and its assault on the environment.
With options like the 104-acre Celebration Park in Allen and Towne Lake Recreation Area in McKinney, which features a 22-acre lake, residents of these two cities have plenty of opportunity to enjoy the Texas weather. No entry fee and plenty of things to do, from use of athletics facilities to fishing, grills and more, draw patrons out year-round. Kids can enjoy the safe playgrounds that feature at most area parks. While furry friends must remain leashed at most parks, dog parks in both Allen and McKinney make for great off-leash playtime.
Hello again! Once again I'm emerging from a span of time where I was either out of the lab or in the lab working on non-newsworthy development, and realizing it's been way too long since I drummed up one of these reports.We had our usual Tuesday outage again today. Same old, same old. However last week we had some scary, unexpected server crashes. First oscar (our main mysql server) crashed, and then a couple hours after that so did carolyn (the replica). Neither crashed as much as the kernels got into some sort of dead lock and couldn't be wedged - in both cases we got the people down at the colocation facility to reboot the machines for us and all was well. Except the replica database needed to be resync'ed. I did so rather quickly though the project has been up for a while and thus not at a safe, clean break point. I thought all was well until after coming out of today's outage when the replica hit a point of confusion in its logs. I guess I need that clean break point - I'm resync'ing again now and will do so again more safely next week. No big deal - this isn't hurting normal operations in the least.Though largely we are under normal operating conditions, there are other behind the scenes activities going on - news to come when the time is right. One thing I can mention is that we're closer and closer to deciding that getting our science database entirely on solid state drives is going to be unavoidable if we are to ever analyze all this data. We just keep hitting disk i/o bottlenecks no matter what we try to speed things up.Any other thoughts and questions? Am I missing anything? Yes, I know about the splitters getting stuck on some files...- Matt-- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude
2) This one is a low-priority, but it involves the database, so anything that can help keep it tidy is worth looking into:When we get stuck WUs where _0 missed the deadline and it got sent out to _2, and then _0 reports before _2 does, _0 and _1 validate, and _2 gets left in "awaiting validation" forever (one of many examples).For this situation, are the uploaded result files for each completed task still on-disk and available for the validator to use them to cross-check? I heard one time that once two results are compared, a canonical is chosen and the other one is "discarded." Does discarded mean deleted immediately, or what?It just seems that once a canonical is chosen, anything that gets reported after that never gets validated. Either there is nothing to validate against, or there is just some logic tweaking needed somewhere. I know it is a daunting task to break it down and look at every line of code, but if we can try to narrow it down to a small portion/section, it would surely make it much easier to fix it.Either the validator doesn't check to see if all of the results have reported, or it checks the first two that it can, chooses a canonical, discards the other, and when the third comes along, it is expecting to be comparing against the other two, but only finds one (the canonical) and then just stops.Getting to the bottom of this issue (and I imagine there are probably tens of thousands overall) can clean the database up quite a bit, and every little bit helps.In a similar vein, we are now also finding WUs where one or both of the users reported some error or other but they've been validated anyway, only they're not being purged. I'm wondering first of all how these can be valid science; I have one where I returned a -9 and my wingmate returned a "CUFFT in line 62" error. Second, why aren't they purging? Is it because each of them has a third user who timed out?One other observation: I notice that the nitpickers are showing as Running. Is this cause for celebration? Even a little bit?DavidSitting on my butt while others boldly go,Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.
Thanks for the heads-up Matt and for the news about the outage of last week.Oh, I meant to say that too.DavidSitting on my butt while others boldly go,Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.
... One thing I can mention is that we're closer and closer to deciding that getting our science database entirely on solid state drives is going to be unavoidable if we are to ever analyze all this data. We just keep hitting disk i/o bottlenecks no matter what we try to speed things up...Have these people sponsor you to try out their new kit?Skyera unveils rival-crushing 21PB-a-rack flash monsterThat should be a win-win. You get rapid access to your largest database of the universe in the universe. They get galactic scale Marketing hype for their hardware...Yes?;-)Keep searchin',MartinSee new freedom: Mageia LinuxTake a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) 2ff7e9595c
Comments